iPhone 16 A18 vs A18 Pro Chipset: Performance Showdown & Benchmarks

Wednesday, 4 June 2025 18:17

Unleash the power of the iPhone 16! Dive into a comprehensive performance comparison of the A18 and A18 Pro chipsets. Explore benchmark scores, architectural differences, and discover which chipset reigns supreme for demanding tasks like gaming and AI.

illustration A18 Pro, A18, iPhone 16, Apple Chipset, Performance Benchmark © copyright Lukas - Pexels

iPhone 16 A18 vs A18 Pro Chipset: Performance Showdown & Benchmarks

Apple's latest iPhone 16 series has introduced the A18 and A18 Pro chipsets, promising unprecedented performance levels. But how do these powerful processors stack up against each other? Let's delve into a detailed performance comparison, analyzing benchmark scores and architectural differences to uncover which chipset reigns supreme.

Understanding the A18 and A18 Pro Architecture

Both the A18 and A18 Pro chipsets share a core architecture, including:

Two Performance Cores: These cores are optimized for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.

Four Efficiency Cores: These cores manage less intensive activities, maximizing battery life.

Five GPU Cores: These cores handle graphics rendering, crucial for smooth visuals and high frame rates.

16 Neural Engine (NPU) Cores: Dedicated for machine learning tasks and AI applications.

The key distinction lies in the A18 Pro's additional GPU core, bringing the total to six. This extra core is expected to significantly boost performance in graphically intensive tasks, such as playing high-end games or editing 4K videos.

While Apple has not yet officially announced clock speeds, it's widely anticipated that the A18 Pro will have higher clock speeds for both its CPU and GPU. This potential increase could translate to further performance gains, especially for tasks involving image processing and video recording.

A18 vs A18 Pro: Benchmark Performance Analysis

To understand the performance differences between the A18 and A18 Pro, let's examine their benchmark scores across various popular testing platforms:

Geekbench 6: A Measure of CPU Power

A18: Single-core score of 3,091, multi-core score of 7,129.

A18 Pro: Single-core score of 3,279, multi-core score of 7,

855. Difference:

The A18 Pro demonstrates a 4.5% advantage in single-core performance and a 10.1% lead in multi-core performance. These results highlight the A18 Pro's superiority in CPU-intensive tasks.

AnTuTu: Overall Performance Benchmark

A18: Score of 1,539,646.

A18 Pro: Score of 1,713,

073. Difference:

The A18 Pro outperforms the A18 by approximately 10.1% in overall performance. This benchmark indicates the A18 Pro's capability to handle a broader range of tasks efficiently.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme: Graphics Performance Test

A18: Score of 3,881, average frame rate of 23.2 fps.

A18 Pro: Score of 4,592, average frame rate of 27.5 fps.

Difference: The A18 Pro showcases a notable 15.5% improvement, emphasizing the impact of the extra GPU core. This benchmark suggests that the A18 Pro is better equipped for graphically demanding games and applications.

GFXBench: GPU-Intensive Benchmarks

A18: Average frame rates of 57.46, 20.42, 81.78, and 351.98 across four tests.

A18 Pro: Average frame rates of 58.8, 26.05, 94.05, and 385.65 across four tests.

Difference: The A18 Pro consistently demonstrates superior performance in GPU-intensive tasks, reinforcing the advantage of its additional GPU core.

Geekbench AI: Machine Learning & AI Performance

A18: Scores of 4,171, 7,288, and 5,810 across three tests.

A18 Pro: Scores of 4,549, 7,815, and 6,242 across three tests.

Difference: The A18 Pro exhibits a 7.2% lead in AI performance, indicating its potential for handling complex machine learning tasks and AI applications.

Conclusion: Which iPhone 16 Chipset is Right for You?

The A18 Pro consistently outperforms the A18, particularly in GPU-related benchmarks. The significant score differences across various tests clearly demonstrate that the extra GPU core on the A18 Pro provides a substantial performance uplift. While the discrepancies might not always be dramatic, the A18 Pro emerges as the superior choice for users seeking peak performance, especially those who enjoy graphics-intensive activities like gaming or demanding video editing.

However, if your usage patterns involve less intensive tasks and you're prioritizing battery life, the A18 might be a suitable choice. Ultimately, the decision depends on your individual needs and priorities.

This detailed comparison provides a clear understanding of the performance differences between the A18 and A18 Pro chipsets in the iPhone 16. Now, you can make an informed decision based on your desired level of performance and usage needs.

Remember: This analysis is based on publicly available benchmark scores. Real-world performance can vary depending on factors like software optimization, usage patterns, and specific applications. Always refer to official Apple documentation and independent reviews for a comprehensive understanding of the iPhone 16 models and their capabilities.

Related Articles

iPhone 16 Pre-Orders Lower Than Expected: Analyst Report
iPhone 16 Pre-Orders Soar in Russia Despite Price Hike
iOS 18.0.1 Update: iPhone 16 Bugs & iPadOS Issues Fixed
iPhone SE 4 Release Date, Specs, & Price: Everything We Know
Apple M4 Max Chip Dominates: Benchmarks Crush Intel & AMD
iPhone 16 Touchscreen Problems: Is It a Software Bug?
Instagram Quiet Mode: How to Enable & Use It for a Digital Detox
Top Data-Hungry Apps: YouTube & Snapchat Lead in 2023
Delete Twitter Account: How to Erase Your Digital Footprint on X
Intel Granite Rapids: Powerful Server Processors with a High Price Tag
E-books: Your Guide to Convenient & Affordable Digital Reading
Remove TikTok Watermark: Easy Guide & Best Tools